🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 573+ reviews
Men βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (573 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Medium wash denim Lucky 7 patch on frontDice and 7 on back pocket 22 baggy legsSize large34 waist

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt delivery
↩️
elementary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage

Medium wash denim
Lucky 7 patch on front
Dice and 7 on back pocket
22" baggy legs
Size large
34" waist

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 29740

Category: Men > Jeans > Baggy, Loose

Original Price: $25 USD

Sale Price: $15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4638 reviews
RH
Ryan Hill
1 month ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
At this point, I’m satisfied with the JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage.
23 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· San Diego, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
Reliable and practical JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage.
33 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase​
7 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure this JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage!
I had no difficulty using the JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage.
35 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Brilliant JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage
Personally, it performs as expected so it’s acceptable.
34 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly happy
Honestly, the JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage works well enough so it’s acceptable.
47 people found this helpful