๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 402+ reviews
Men โœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

VINTAGE y2k design black baggy jeans, SIZE L

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.8 out of 5 (402 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$28
$46.67
Sale
โœ“ at no charge delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Black lightly faded vintage jeans

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt delivery
โ†ฉ๏ธ
elementary Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

VINTAGE y2k design black baggy jeans, SIZE L

Black lightly faded vintage jeans

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Men products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 30181

Category: Men > Jeans > Baggy, Loose

Original Price: $46.67 USD

Sale Price: $28 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ complimentary delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9161 reviews
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago ยท Philadelphia, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Impressed!​
To be fair, the VINTAGE y2k design black baggy jeans, SIZE L is uncomplicated to use and it works for me.
17 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Las Vegas, NV
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
certainly impressed
The VINTAGE y2k design black baggy jeans, SIZE L looks clean and latest.
31 people found this helpful
NH​
Nicole Harris โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
outstanding for my needs
The VINTAGE y2k design black baggy jeans, SIZE L is functional and sturdy.​
44 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker
6 months ago ยท Columbus, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…​
outstanding purchase
For the price, it feels okay so no complaints.
7 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So happy with this
The VINTAGE y2k design black baggy jeans, SIZE L is practical and well designed.
34 people found this helpful