🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 454+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller

Vintage Sterling THICK Cigar band style Victorian Wedding ring SOLID band

★★★★★ 4.5 out of 5 (454 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30.4
$50.67
Sale
✓ at no charge delivery on this item • Limited time offer

Genuine Sterling Silver Hallmark size measurement and reference pics included (1/2” at widest)Size 7 (snug 7.5)Ring in good vintage condition with natural wear and Patina A well made current Cigar or Concave Wedding bandConstructed of fine sterling silver in a concave/cigar type fashion which means it is not a heavy ring. Comfortable for length in wearing (as a wedding band should be)exquisite Victorian or swirled etchings on outer bands surrounding a smooth inner band that is perfect for inscription or personalization So many possibilities with this gorgeous ringGreat for man or womanThe perfect COMFORTABLE wedding band with lovely markings •••Please remember this IS a USED/VINTAGE item. Please do NOT purchase expecting it to be “NEW” and or perfect!! There may be a flaw or two I miss as I am ONLY human. However, I try to get pics from every angle! Make sure to view ALL pics and ask questions so you know EXACTLY what your receiving•••Pics actual item

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy dispatch
↩️
straightforward Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage Sterling THICK Cigar band style Victorian Wedding ring SOLID band

Genuine Sterling Silver
Hallmark size measurement and reference pics included (1/2” at widest)
Size 7 (snug 7.5)
Ring in good vintage condition with natural wear and Patina

A well made up-to-date Cigar or Concave Wedding band
Constructed of fine sterling silver in a concave/cigar type fashion which means it is not a heavy ring. smooth for length in wearing (as a wedding band should be)
lovely Victorian or swirled etchings on outer bands surrounding a smooth inner band that is flawless for inscription or personalization
So numerous possibilities with this gorgeous ring
fabulous for man or woman
The perfect gentle wedding band with lovely markings

•••Please remember this IS a USED/VINTAGE item. Please do NOT purchase expecting it to be “NEW” and or remarkable!! There may be a flaw or two I miss as I am ONLY human. However, I try to get pics from every angle!
Make sure to view complete pics and ask questions so you know EXACTLY what your receiving•••

Pics actual item

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 689106

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price:$50.67 USD

Sale Price: $30.4 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ at no charge dispatch on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.5
★★★★★
Based on 7951 reviews
WG
William Garcia ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · Tampa, FL
★★★★★
definitely impressed
Personally, the Vintage Sterling THICK Cigar band style Victorian Wedding ring SOLID band does its job so no complaints. Nothing fancy.
16 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Charlotte, NC
★★★★★
Exceptional quality
Honestly, the Vintage Sterling THICK Cigar band style Victorian Wedding ring SOLID band works as described so it’s acceptable.
5 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · brand-new York, NY
★★★★★
supreme purchase ever
Nice design on the Vintage Sterling THICK Cigar band style Victorian Wedding ring SOLID band.
40 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell ✓ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago · San Jose, CA
★★★★★
Totally worth it
The Vintage Sterling THICK Cigar band style Victorian Wedding ring SOLID band is elementary enough to handle.
28 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee ✓ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago · Virginia Beach, VA
★★★★★
superb value for money
Nice and reliable product Vintage Sterling THICK Cigar band style Victorian Wedding ring SOLID band.
47 people found this helpful