🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 615+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage magazine rack and dust pan

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5 (615 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6.5
$10.83
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Wrought iron magazine rack and metal dust pan. Offers accepted

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt delivery
↩️
elementary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage magazine rack and dust pan

Wrought iron magazine rack and metal dust pan.
Offers accepted​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1401379

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Other

Original Price: $10.83 USD

Sale Price: $6.5 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3661 reviews
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
Performance of the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan has been stable.
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 weeks ago Β· Dallas, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
In daily use, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan works fine so it’s acceptable.
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
Personally, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan performs as expected and it’s fine overall.
13 people found this helpful

BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
So glad I bought this
Personally, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan is straightforward to use so I’m okay with it.
10 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
The Vintage magazine rack and dust pan arrived exactly as described.
16 people found this helpful